When a politician asks a NASA scientist if there used to be an ancient civilization on Mars, it's bound to make headlines. And that's just what happened on July 18th, when US Congressman and House Representative Dana Rohrabacher of California posed a pondering question to Ken Farley, one of the planetary scientists speaking at a hearing about science, space, and technology: "Is it possible that there was a civilization on Mars thousands of years ago?"
As silly as this question seems, it's actually quite reasonable, considering the subject matter at hand - water on Mars! Although the Mars Rover hasn't captured any compelling evidence of current life on Mars, NASA has repeatedly presented evidence to the public over the years that there used to be water (the key ingredient for life!) on Mars, and there could be water there today. Considering that humans evolved rather quickly in the grand cosmic scheme of things, is it really that hard to believe that an intelligent society of humanoids or aliens could have prospered on Mars a long time ago?
Not to mention... there was that time the CIA tired to remote view Mars... and possibly even succeeded at viewing intelligent Martians living there in the distant past. Yes, really. The "Stargate Project" was the code name given to the CIA's secret "remote viewing" program, which lasted from the 1970s to the 90s. In one experiment, a student of the program apparently astral projected to Mars and saw unnatural structures, and communicated with thin, tall beings!
If NASA has painted such a clear picture of Mars, then why did the government pay the CIA to remote view the planet?
Meanwhile, NASA seems quietly confident that they will discover ET life in the near future, stating that life in the universe could be ubiquitous, and also stating that they won't necessarily have to send boots on the ground to discover it, but satellites and robots like the Mars Rover. (Or NASA can just psychically view the red planet, perhaps.)
NASA has even made posters promoting the colonization of Mars:
The planetary scientist's answer to the Rep. Rohrabacher was fairly predictable and uninspired: "I would say that is extremely unlikely."
No offense to NASA as an institution, but many UFO researchers may find this specific response to be pretty preposterous. We are still learning about new human ancestors and civilizations on Planet Earth; it would seem eccentrically arrogant to presume anything about the ancient history of a planet we've only recently been studying up close.
What do you think about this story? Does it help or hurt UFO and Alien Disclosure? Do you think we will see more stories like these over the coming months? Share your theories on this and more in the comments below, or join the conversation on Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram! You can also subscribe on YouTube.
Here we go again. More strange signals from a distant star have been detected. This time, the astronomers who detected it were based in Puerto Rico, and the star at the heart of the story is Ross 128, a red dwarf star based about 11 light-years away from Earth. The signals were described as "broadband quasi-periodic non-polarized pulses with very strong dispersion-like features."
As with other stories like this one, mainstream news outlets were quick to sensationalize the discovery with headlines teasing about alien life, but were also quick to confidently conclude that the likely explanation for the signals were not extraterrestrial at all... but terrestrial, perhaps caused by solar flares or a satellite in high orbit:
Although these terrestrial theories were indeed offered up by the scientists who made the discovery, the original scientists also feel these theories are very problematic and not at all satisfying, writing that "the recurrent aliens hypothesis is at the bottom of many other better explanations."
Why do mainstream science and news publications like to tease the idea of aliens as much as they enjoy shooting it down? Even in the face of such compelling evidence! There is no way that these outlets can offer additional insight or authority onto whether or not these signals are terrestrial or extraterrestrial in origin, but they seem eager to do so.
Americans get an endless brigade of half-baked news stories about the possibility of water and ET life on other planets, and these stories rarely, if ever end with any real conclusion or evidence. As well, this is hardly the first time US news outlets have echoed headlines about weird "alien signals" detected from outer space. (Remember the "Wow!" Signal?) Meanwhile, NASA has been hinting that they will discover ET life, at the very least microbial, in the near future. There is a lot of contradiction when you study the media narrative about this subject.
Are news stories like these part of an intentional, but painfully slow and steady drip to disclose the already-known truth about UFOs and aliens in our universe? Or are we just continuing to probe for life in a universe where it is very rare, and possibly even nonexistent?
NASA has posted an amazing photo taken by the Mars Rover, this time no showing a rock that kind of looks like a face, but a "clear-as-an-Earth-Day" image of some shiny metal parts of some kind:
Left Panoramic Camera Non-linearized Full frame EDR acquired on Sol 348 of Opportunity's mission to Meridiani Planum at approximately 12:45:41 Mars local solar time, camera commanded to use Filter 7 (432 nm). NASA/JPL/Cornell
This photo naturally rocked the Reddit UFO community, which enthusiastically discussed the photo but concluded that the photo was actually just of debris from the Mars Rover itself. Despite this conclusion, Fox News then parroted the headline (UFO on Mars!) as well as the explanation.
This is not the first time odd things have been photographed by the Rover. Check out this photo that TexasUFOs covered, which shows a UFO or fireball gliding past the Mars Rover:
Considering all that, do you really think this is Mars Rover debris, or perhaps something more alien or martian in nature? Why would NASA post a photo like this with no explanation at all, furthermore? The fact that we are only assuming this is the Rover, versus knowing for a sure fact, is definitely intriguing. Is this part of NASA's disclosure of UFOs and ET life in our universe?
Share your theories on this space story and more in the comments or on Facebook, Twitter or Instagram. You can also follow all the latest UFO space stories and Disclosure right here!
Did you know you can find out what's going on with the International Space Station at any given moment, given the amazing and breathtaking live ISS stream? Well, you can! You can even get a live stream of the Earth from above. This access has spawned dozens, maybe even hundreds of UFO stories online, as viewers are always seeing strange things out there in the space! One of the more recent sightings was submitted to MUFON (case 83465) by a Manchester, England resident, and features a blue orb that apparently shifted into a "flying saucer":
On april 29th at around 21:06 g.m.t for around 10-15 seconds during a live stream of the international space station i observed a faint light which got lighter before appearing as two whitish lights before materializing into what i can only describe as a "flying saucer" the event (which i was hoping would happen) only lasted 10-15 secs which i managed to screenshot the photos on my iphone i know what this wasn't and would hope somebody else has this footage on video.
UFO researcher Scott Waring has come across an interesting, official NASA photo that shows an astronaut walking on the moon, and two bright triangle or "funnel"-shaped lights appearing to ascend or descend in the background:
What do you think these strange lights could be? Lens flare? Meteors? Other moon rovers? Share your opinions in the comments below, or join the conversation on Facebook, Twitter or Instagram!